A workplace safety inspection report records what was examined, what was found and what happened to each finding afterwards. The first two are routine. The third is what shows whether the inspection led to any change.
Key takeaways
- A workplace safety inspection report needs three records: one for the inspection itself, one for every finding, and one for each recommendation and corrective action, each with an owner, a due date and evidence.
- Record what was not inspected as well as what was, so that gaps in coverage are visible.
- The person assigned a corrective action to fix a finding should not be the only one who confirms the fix.
- Managers and officers need open and overdue corrective actions, findings by rating, repeat findings, and missed inspections. A count of inspections completed says little on its own.
- A spreadsheet can work for one site. It tends to struggle once findings need notifications, change history and consistent reporting across several sites.
Comcare’s guidance on conducting workplace inspections is explicit about the third part. Among its things to consider after an inspection are how findings and corrective actions are tracked, managed and completed, and who is responsible for closing them out in a timely manner. A report that cannot answer those questions is a list of observations.
This guide includes a sample report and three free downloads: a checklist for the walk-through, an editable Word report and an Excel tracker that flags overdue corrective actions and produces the monthly summary. The three-record structure, ratings, timeframes and reporting measures in this guide are suggested practice, not legal requirements. Where a duty comes from a regulator or legislation, the text says so and links to the source.
Free downloads: checklist, report and tracker
All three files are editable and need no sign-up. They do different jobs, so most teams use them together. Change the rating levels and response times to match your own risk matrix.
Checklist, report or tracker? The checklist is what you carry on the walk-through. The report is the record of one inspection: what was found and what will be done about each finding. The tracker follows findings and their corrective actions across inspections and shows what is open, overdue or repeating.
What a workplace safety inspection report is for
One report serves three readers. A supervisor needs enough detail to find the problem and fix it. Health and safety representatives (HSRs) and committees need access to the reports and the process, and workers need to be told what the inspection found. Regulator guidance, for example from SafeWork NSW, lists both among the steps after an inspection. Senior managers and officers need to know whether hazards are being found and closed at a reasonable rate.
Officers also have a legal reason to ask. Under the model WHS laws they must exercise due diligence, which Safe Work Australia describes as including active monitoring and evaluation of WHS management. It adds that officers can meet the duty by making sure the business has reporting processes for incidents, hazards and other WHS issues, and by checking that those processes are followed. Inspection records are one practical way to do that checking.
Which law applies to you. Safe Work Australia reports that every Australian jurisdiction except Victoria has implemented the model WHS laws, and that some have varied them. In Victoria, the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 requires employers to provide a safe working environment (section 21) and to monitor workplace conditions and keep health and safety records (section 22), in each case so far as is reasonably practicable.
Regulators across Australia. Each state and territory regulator publishes material on workplace inspections. Only the SafeWork NSW page is written for businesses carrying out their own inspections. The others explain what the regulator’s inspectors do on a visit.
- Victoria (WorkSafe Victoria): inspectors carry out targeted inspections, respond to incidents and complaints, and give guidance to duty holders. The page notes that it is being updated.
- New South Wales (SafeWork NSW): guidance for businesses on carrying out their own workplace inspections.
- Queensland (WorkSafe Queensland): inspectors visit to respond to incidents and monitor compliance, and generally give no prior notice.
- Western Australia (WorkSafe WA): inspectors can enter a suspected workplace at any time without notice, with priorities such as manual tasks and psychosocial hazards.
- South Australia (SafeWork SA): sets out what inspectors may do on a visit, including examining the workplace, taking measurements and asking questions.
- Tasmania (WorkSafe Tasmania): explains why inspectors visit and their entry powers.
- Australian Capital Territory (WorkSafe ACT): inspectors arrange visits in advance only when notice will not jeopardise the visit.
- Northern Territory (NT WorkSafe): inspectors run safety campaigns and investigate incidents and unsafe practices.
Check your regulator’s current guidance for the duties, record-keeping and notification requirements that apply to you. Good records and software can support compliance with those duties, but they cannot guarantee it.
What to include in a workplace safety inspection report
The inspection record
Start with a short header record for each inspection. It should answer the questions someone will ask months later:
- The date, the site and area covered, and the checklist used, including its version, because checklists change.
- Who inspected and who accompanied them, including any HSR.
- Areas or items that were not inspected, with the reason and a rescheduled date.
- Whether someone checked the findings from the previous inspection.
- Concerns raised by workers during the walk-through. Some regulator guidance advises asking workers how they do their tasks and inviting health and safety concerns.
- The number of new findings, by rating.
The checklist is part of the record. Some regulator guidance notes that the checklist also serves as a record of the inspection, and Comcare says the checklist should be tailored to the hazards of the workplace and developed with HSRs, managers and workers. A tailored checklist is likely to be more useful as a record than a generic one. If you are building one, the free checklist above is a starting point, and the types of workplace hazards show what else to add.
The record for each finding
Each finding needs its own record. Several issues combined into one line are hard to rate, assign and close separately. These are the fields that matter later. What will be done about the finding is recorded separately, in a record for each action.
| Field | What to record | Why it matters later |
|---|---|---|
| Finding number | A unique number such as F-001 | Links the finding to its actions, and to any later finding that repeats it |
| Location | The specific area, asset or task, not only the site | Lets a different person find it, and shows where findings cluster |
| Observation | What was seen, in factual terms, without blaming a person | Keeps the record usable when it is read months later |
| Evidence | A photo or measurement taken at the time | Shows the condition before any fix |
| Cause | A short note on why it happened, where known | Without it, the fix tends to treat a symptom and the finding returns |
| Rating | The level assigned using your risk matrix | Sets how fast the finding is fixed and who is told |
| Made safe at the time | Anything done on the spot to remove immediate danger | Separates making safe from fixing properly |
| Corrective action | The number of each recommendation or corrective action that deals with the finding | Links the finding to the records where each fix is tracked |
| Earlier findings | A reference to any previous finding on the same item or area | Reveals repeat findings |
Cause is the field that is easiest to leave blank. Some regulator guidance advises identifying why a problem occurred, for example a leak, a work process or a training gap, instead of only noting that it exists. The link to earlier findings turns a pile of reports into a pattern: problems not corrected since the previous inspection are among the first things that inspection guidance says to look for.
The record for each recommendation and corrective action
A finding can need more than one fix, so each recommendation and corrective action gets its own record, linked to the finding by number. That lets each one have its own owner, due date and evidence.
| Field | What to record | Why it matters later |
|---|---|---|
| Action number | A unique number such as A-001 | Lets actions be counted, aged and traced back to a finding |
| Finding number | The finding the action deals with. One finding can have several actions | Keeps the finding and its fixes linked |
| Recommendation or corrective action | What will be done, and how it deals with the cause as well as the symptom | Separates the fix from the observation |
| Owner | One named person or position | Shared ownership leaves it unclear who answers for the due date |
| Due date | A date set from the rating, with any approved extension recorded separately | Allows overdue actions to be counted and aged |
| Completion evidence | What changed, shown by a photo, work order or revised procedure | A status of done is an assertion. Evidence lets someone else confirm it |
| Verification | Who checked, when, and what they saw. Not the person assigned the action | Shows whether the fix worked |
| Status and closure | Open, overdue, closed and not verified, or closed and verified. A finding is closed only when all of its actions are | Shows what is still outstanding |
Rating findings so the response matches the risk
A rating tells the owner how quickly to move and tells managers what to look at first. Use the risk matrix from your organisation’s existing risk assessments, so an inspection rating means the same as a hazard or incident rating. A separate inspection scale can create a second risk language that then has to be mapped back to the first.
Whatever scale you use, regulator guidance is clear about the top end. SafeWork NSW says to fix serious hazards and unsafe work practices immediately, and describes that as a legal obligation. Comcare says management should be told straight away about an immediate danger, and that work may need to stop until the risk is eliminated or adequately controlled. You can prioritise lower-rated findings and assign each fix to a named person or position, then follow up the slower actions until they are done.
One workable approach is three response levels, whatever they are called locally: make safe now, fix by a set date, and schedule. This grouping is suggested practice, not a regulatory scheme. The timeframes attached to each level are your organisation’s decision, based on your matrix and on what is reasonably practicable.
Sample workplace safety inspection report
Consider a council depot where the supervisor has just finished the monthly inspection of the workshop and yard. The report below shows how that inspection might be recorded. The depot and its findings are hypothetical. They are not taken from a real site or a Skefto customer, and the ratings and timeframes are placeholders for you to replace with your own.
Inspection record
- Site and area
- Council depot, workshop and yard
- Date
- 3 November 2026
- Inspector
- Depot supervisor
- Accompanied by
- Workshop supervisor and the health and safety representative
- Checklist
- Depot workshop checklist, version 3
- Previous findings checked
- Yes. The blocked emergency exit was recorded twice before in the past six months.
- Not inspected
- Chemical store, because the key holder was absent. Rescheduled for 10 November 2026.
Findings
| Finding | Rating | Made safe at the time | Corrective action |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-001. Vehicle bay roller door: safety edge did not stop the door when tested | High | Door isolated and tagged out, vehicle moved | A-001. Replace the safety edge and re-test the door |
| F-002. Workshop emergency exit partly blocked by stored pallets. Repeat finding: third time at this location in six months | High | Pallets removed during the inspection | A-002. Mark a pallet storage area away from the exit. A-003. Add an exit-clear check to the close-down |
| F-003. Workshop spill kit empty | Medium | Kit moved from the yard store | A-004. Restock the spill kit and add it to the monthly check |
| F-004. Fire extinguisher service label two months overdue | Medium | Gauge and seal checked. Service booked with the contractor | A-005. Service the extinguisher and fit a current label |
Recommendations and corrective actions
| Action | Finding | Recommendation or corrective action | Owner and due | Verified by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-001 | F-001 | Replace the faulty safety edge, then re-test that the door stops and reverses on contact | Facilities coordinator, 10 November | Depot manager re-tests the door and photographs the repair |
| A-002 | F-002 | Mark a pallet storage area away from the exit | Workshop supervisor, 13 November | Depot manager, at the next inspection and with a photo |
| A-003 | F-002 | Add an exit-clear check to the workshop close-down and brief the team | Workshop supervisor, 17 November | Depot manager, at the next inspection and with a photo |
| A-004 | F-003 | Restock the workshop spill kit and add it to the monthly workshop check | Store officer, 17 November | Supervisor, at the next inspection |
| A-005 | F-004 | Have the contractor service the extinguisher and fit a current service label | Facilities coordinator, 17 November | Supervisor checks the new service label |
Summary and sign-off
Four findings: two High, two Medium. Five corrective actions, none overdue. One repeat finding. One area not inspected. Signed by the depot supervisor. Report available to the depot manager and the health and safety representative.
In this scenario the supervisor clears the blocked exit during the walk, but the record does not stop there. Because it is a repeat finding, the corrective actions have to deal with why pallets keep ending up in front of the exit (perhaps the workshop has no designated storage area) instead of clearing them a third time. F-002 also shows why each action needs its own record: one finding, two actions, two due dates. The chemical store appears as a gap in coverage with a new date, not as a blank line, and every closure names someone other than the person assigned the action to confirm it.
To use the same three records for your own inspections, download the Word report template or the Excel findings tracker. The tracker includes this depot scenario on an example sheet, with the summary shown at two dates.
Closing the loop: three questions after every inspection
Comcare lists three things to consider after an inspection. Restated as questions, they make a useful test for any inspection program.
- InspectUse the scheduled checklist. Record what was not inspected.
- RecordOne finding per issue: location, facts and a photo.
- RateRate it against your risk matrix. Make serious hazards safe straight away.
- AssignAgree each action. One named person or position and a due date set by the rating.
- FixDo the work and attach evidence of what changed.
- VerifySomeone other than the person assigned the action checks that the fix worked.
How are findings and corrective actions tracked, managed and completed?
A practical standard for tracking is that every finding sits in one list and its status cannot change without evidence. Completed then means evidenced: a photo of the new condition, a finished work order, or a revised procedure with a record that people were briefed on it.
Good practice is for the check that the fix worked to come from someone other than the person assigned the action, because that person has an interest in the answer. Flinders University, for example, allows an inspection to be marked complete only when all of its corrective actions have been completed. Safe Work Australia’s risk management steps end with reviewing control measures to make sure they work as planned. Inspection findings are one place where that review happens in the ordinary run of work.
Some actions will miss their dates because a part is on order or a budget has not been approved. Record the delay as a decision rather than letting the date pass. Re-rate the finding if circumstances have changed, put an interim control in place, and escalate to someone with the authority to resource the fix. Choose the interim control with care. Safe Work Australia ranks administrative controls and personal protective equipment lowest because they rely on human behaviour and supervision, so a physical barrier will hold better than a sign and a reminder at the next toolbox talk. The risk control hierarchy explains the ranking.
Who is responsible for closing findings out in a timely manner?
One named person or position for each finding. Actions assigned to a team or to a position can stay open when staff change. Decide in advance who receives the overdue list. The owner’s manager is a common choice.
Were the findings discussed with the relevant work group?
Some regulator guidance lists telling workers what the inspection found and giving the HSR or committee access to the reports. In practice that is a short summary at the next team meeting and a report the HSR can open. Workers who see reported issues fixed are more likely to keep raising them.
What managers and officers should see
A monthly summary does not need to be long. Five suggested measures give a manager or officer a workable picture, as an input to their own enquiries. They are not a regulatory reporting set. The table also shows how each measure would read for the depot sample above.
| Measure | The question it answers | Reading for the depot sample |
|---|---|---|
| Inspections completed against those scheduled, and the areas not inspected | Are we actually looking? | The workshop and yard inspection took place. The chemical store did not and has a new date. |
| Open findings by rating | What needs attention first? | Two High and two Medium. |
| Open and overdue corrective actions, and how long each has been overdue | What is slipping? | Five open, none overdue. The first due date is 10 November, for the roller door repair. |
| Repeat findings, grouped by location, asset or cause | What keeps coming back? | The blocked exit, for the third time in six months. |
| Corrective actions closed with verification compared with those closed without it | Can we trust the closures? | No closures yet. |
Read them alongside incident and hazard reporting data. Comcare’s guidance suggests reviewing that data when carrying out an inspection, and the comparison also tests the program. A site that records almost no inspection findings while workers keep reporting hazards may have inspections that are too shallow, or hazards that the checklist does not cover.
Inspections, audits and audit readiness
An inspection examines the workplace and work practices as they are on the day. An audit tests whether the safety management system works as designed, and it may sample inspection records among other evidence. Inspections are one input to the assurance part of a safety management system. Audit readiness comes mostly from the records described above: the schedule, the completed checklists, the findings log, the closure and verification evidence, and a note of how repeat findings were handled. If those exist and agree with each other, an auditor has fewer gaps to query.
When a spreadsheet stops being enough for inspection records
The Excel tracker above suits one site or one team. A spreadsheet or shared folder starts to fail in predictable places once the program grows:
- Findings sit in photo galleries and emails instead of in the list.
- Owners are not notified and find out at the next meeting.
- A changed due date overwrites the original, so nobody can see how long a finding has really been open.
- Someone assembles the monthly summary by hand from several sites’ files, each in a different format.
- Inspectors work in depots, plant rooms and regional sites without a signal and re-enter their notes later.
What a safety system adds
Inspection and corrective action tools in a safety system are designed to address these problems. Skefto lets teams schedule inspections and audits from configurable templates and checklists with reminders, and complete them on mobile-enabled forms where the work takes place, including offline where connectivity is limited. It records a failed checklist item with evidence and turns it into a corrective action with an assigned owner and due date. It notifies people of the actions assigned to them, and its reports show compliance levels and the progress of actions. The page for Skefto’s safety software describes the full workflow.
Skefto Safety sits within a wider platform. Its incident management solution considers incidents and injuries alongside hazard and inspection history, and its risk management solution shows WHS risks alongside the wider risk profile. Which solutions apply, and how they relate, is scoped with each organisation.
How to test any system
When comparing options, test any of them, including Skefto, against last quarter’s real inspection findings. Pick a finding that went overdue and ask each system to show the finding, its owner, every change to its due date, the closure evidence and the verification. A system that can produce that trail on request passes the test. One that shows only a status does not.
A practical first step
Whatever you decide, start with your last three inspection reports. For every finding and corrective action, check whether it has a named person or position as owner, a due date, dated closure evidence and a verifier who is not the person assigned the action. The proportion that does is your baseline, and the gaps show which fields your process is missing.
See how Skefto could support your inspections and corrective actions
Explore inspections, incident and hazard reporting and corrective actions in a demonstration focused on your organisation.
Sources and further reading
- Comcare, Conduct workplace inspections
- SafeWork NSW, Workplace inspections and After the inspection
- WorkSafe Victoria, WorkSafe inspectors and enforcement
- WorkSafe Queensland, Workplace inspections
- WorkSafe WA, Workplace inspections
- SafeWork SA, WHS inspectors
- WorkSafe Tasmania, Inspectors and inspections
- WorkSafe ACT, Workplace inspections
- NT WorkSafe, Workplace visits
- Safe Work Australia, Officer duties, Identify, assess and control hazards: managing risks and Model WHS laws
- WorkSafe Victoria, Summary of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004: general OHS duties
- Flinders University, Workplace safety inspections
